Rubenstein v. United States, 546 U.S. 876 (2005). · Go Syfert
Rubenstein v. United States, 546 U.S. 876 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Picard v. J. Ezra Merkin, Gabriel Capital, L.P. (In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC) (nysb, 2014-08-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Picard v. J. Ezra Merkin, Gabriel Capital, L.P. (In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
“Willful blindness,” on the other hand, involves two elements: “(1) the defendant must subjectively believe that there is a high probability that a fact exists and (2) the defendant must take deliberate actions to avoid learning of that fact.” Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A., — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2060, 2070 , 179 L.Ed.2d 1167 (2011) (emphasis added). 15 If a person who is not under an independent duty to investigate “nonetheless, intentionally chooses to blind himself to the ‘red flags’ that suggest a high probability of fraud, his ‘willful blindness’ to the truth …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rubenstein
v.
United States
No. 05-158.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2005.
546 U.S. 876
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.