discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mario Thibeaux “Where a reasonable-minded jury could have found evidence sufficient to convict, we will not disturb the verdict just because a different jury might have reached a different conclusion.” United States v. Peters, 462 F.3d 953, 958-59 (8th Cir.2006); see United States v. Walker, 393 F.3d 842, 847 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 953 , 126 S.Ct. 463 , 163 L.Ed.2d 352 (2005); United States v. Anderson, 78 F.3d 420, 422 (8th Cir.1996).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Penson See United States v. Zabawa, 134 Fed.Appx. 60, 67 (6th Cir.2005) (unpublished), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 953 , 126 S.Ct. 463 , 163 L.Ed.2d 352 (2005).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Penson See United States v. Zabawa, 134 F. App’x 60, 67 (6th Cir. 2005) (unpublished), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 953 (2005).