green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.5 score
“in order to ij ij i l invoke the right of self-representation, the request to proceed prose must be made timely and not i l i l for purposes of delay and must be clear and unequivocal.”
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Com. v. Williams, G.
in order to ij ij i l invoke the right of self-representation, the request to proceed prose must be made timely and not i l i l for purposes of delay and must be clear and unequivocal.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Davido, T., Aplt
(2×)
See Davido v. Pennsylvania, 546 U.S. 1020 , 126 S.Ct. 660 , 163 L.Ed.2d 534 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Holley
See Commonwealth v. Davido, 582 Pa. 52 , 71 n. 18, 868 A.2d 431 , 442 n. 18 (2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1020 , 126 S.Ct. 660 , 163 L.Ed.2d 534 (2005). 4 ¶8 Holley next argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions for attempted murder and aggravated assault.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. El
(2×)
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Davido, 582 Pa. 52 , 868 A.2d 431 (2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1020 , 126 S.Ct. 660 , 163 L.Ed.2d 534 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Davido
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 05-6390.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 2005.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (1)
Sup. Ct. Pa. Cer-tiorari denied.