Pridgen v. United States, 546 U.S. 1053 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Pridgen v. United States, 546 U.S. 1053 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Debra J. Stephenson (ca8, 2007-07-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Debra J. Stephenson
8th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reichow, 416 F.3d 802, 806 (8th Cir.) (impermissible double counting occurs where one part of Guidelines is applied to increase punishment on account of harm fully accounted for by another part of Guidelines), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1052 , 126 S.Ct. 784 , 163 L.Ed.2d 607 (2005); cf. United States v. Joiner, 418 F.3d 863 , 870 (8th Cir.2005) (obstruction-of-justice enhancement did not take into account victim’s official status, and thus assessing additional 3-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2(a) (official victim) was not double-counting).
discussed Cited "see" Dennis Fitzgerald v. Robert Beringhaus
11th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smith, 416 F.3d 1350 , 1352 n. 1 (11th Cir.) (explaining that the prudential rule of declining to consider issues not raised in a party’s initial brief is “well-established” in our circuit), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 784 , 163 L.Ed.2d 608 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Dawn Ann Curry
11th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smith, 416 F.3d 1350 , 1352 n. 1 (11th Cir.) (explaining that the prudential rule of declining to consider issues not timely raised in a party’s initial brief is "well-established” in this Circuit), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 784 , 163 L.Ed.2d 608 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Michael Couran
11th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smith, 416 F.3d 1350 , 1352 n. 1 (11th Cir.) (explaining that the prudential rule of declining to consider issues not timely raised in a party's initial brief is "well-established” in this Circuit), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 784 , 163 L.Ed.2d 608 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jessie Debough Mercer
11th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smith, 385 F.3d 1342, 1346 (11th Cir. 2004) (that defendant received concurrent sentences for state convictions does not render those convictions related under § 4A1.2), vacated, 543 U.S. 1181 , 125 S.Ct. 1401 , 161 L.Ed.2d 175 (2005), opinion reinstated, 416 F.3d 1350 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 784 , 163 L.Ed.2d 608 (2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Renard L. Washington
11th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Reichow, 416 F.3d 802, 805 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 784 , 163 L.Ed.2d 607 (2005); United States v. Donaby, 349 F.3d 1046, 1053 (7th Cir.2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pridgen
v.
United States
No. 05-7288.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 2005.
546 U.S. 1053
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.