discussed Cited "see" Thomas v. McDonough Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408, 418 , 125 S.Ct. 1807 , 161 L.Ed.2d 669 (2005) (citation omitted); see Anderson v. Attorney Gen. of Florida, 135 Fed.Appx. 244, 246 (11th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (not published in the Federal Reporter) (noting that in Pace , the petitioner failed to show that he exercised the requisite diligence), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 835 , 163 L.Ed.2d 711 (2005).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kuenzel v. Allen The court stated simply: “[W]e hold that time limits, no matter their form, are ‘filing’ conditions.” Id. at 417 , 125 S.Ct. at 1814 [italics added]; see also Anderson v. Attorney General of Florida, 135 Fed.Appx. 244, 246 (11th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1078 , 126 S.Ct. 835 , 163 L.Ed.2d 711 (2005).