green
Positive treatment
10.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Reynaldo Parado Rodriguez v. State
See United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459, 470 (4th Cir.2009) (“As noted above, the elements of a SORNA failure to register offense ... are that the defendant (1) was required to register....”), cer t. denied, 559 U.S. 974 , 130 S.Ct. 1686 , 176 L.Ed.2d 186 (2010); see also State v. Abshire, 363 N.C. 322 , 677 S.E.2d 444, 449 (2009) (holding that one essential element of the crime of “failing to notify the appropriate sheriff of a sex offender’s change of address” is that “the defendant is a ‘person required ... to register’ ”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Rogers
See United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459 (4th Cir.2009), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1686 , 176 L.Ed.2d 186 (2010). “[A] panel of this court cannot overrule, explicitly or implicitly, the precedent set by a prior panel of this court.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Molineux
See [U.S. v.] Gould, 568 F.3d [459] at 468-69 [ (4th Cir.2007), cert. denied, Gould v. U.S., — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 1686 , 176 L.Ed.2d 186 (2010)]; [U.S. v.] Dixon, 551 F.3d [578] at 584 [(7th Cir.2008), reversed and remanded on other grounds, Carr v. U.S., — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 2229 , 176 L.Ed.2d 1152 (2010) ]; United States v. Hinckley, 550 F.3d 926, 938 (10th Cir.2008), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 129 S.Ct. 2383 , 173 L.Ed.2d 1301 (2009); United States v. May, 535 F.3d 912, 921 (8th Cir.2008), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 2431 , 174 L.Ed.2d 229 (2009).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Yelloweagle
See United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459, 473-74 (4th Cir.2009) (discussing Congressional findings), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1686 , 176 L.Ed.2d 186 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jemison
See, [United States v.] McCane, 573 F.3d [1037] at 1045 [ (10th Cir.2009) cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1686 (2010)] (‘[T]his court declines to apply the exclusionary rule when law enforcement officers act in objectively reasonable reliance upon the settled case law of a United States Court of Appeals.’); [United State v.] Jackson, 825 F.2d [853] at 866 [(5th Cir.1987)] (‘[T]he exclusionary rule should not be applied to searches which relied on Fifth Circuit law prior to the change of that law....’).
examined
Cited "see"
People v. McCarty
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See generally United States v. McCane, 573 F.3d 1037, 1041-45 (10th Cir.2009) (holding that the good-faith exception applies where officers relied on circuit's erroneous pre- Gant jurisprudence), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 1686 , 176 L.Ed.2d 179 (2010); United States v. Davis, 598 F.3d 1259, 1264 (11th Cir.2010) (same); People v. Key, No. 07CA1257, ___ P.3d ___, ___, 2010 WL 961646 , at *2 (Colo.App.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dean
(2×)
See United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459 (4th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 1686 , 176 L.Ed.2d 186 , 2010 WL 680575 (2010); United States v. Cain, 583 F.3d 408 (6th Cir.2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America v. Ricardo GONZALEZ
See United States v. McCane, 573 F.3d 1037 (10th Cir.2009), cert. denied, No. 09-402, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1686 , 176 L.Ed.2d 179 , 78 U.S.L.W. 3221 (Mar. 1, 2010); United States v. Jackson, 825 F.2d 853 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Parks
Compare United States v. Dean, 604 F.3d 1275, 1282 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 642 , 178 L.Ed.2d 486 (2010) (finding that the Interim Rule governs), and United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459, 470 (4th Cir.2009), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1686 , 176 L.Ed.2d 186 (2010) (same), with United States v. Utesch, 596 F.3d 302 , 310 & 311 n. 8 (6th Cir.2010) (finding that the 2008 action governs), and United States v. Valverde, 628 F.3d 1159, 1169 (9th Cir.2010), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1534 , 182 L.Ed.2d 219 (2012) (same). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marzzarella
Compare United States v. Scroggins, 599 F.3d 433, 451 (5th Cir.2010) (characterizing this language as dicta), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. June 1, 2010) (09-11204), and United States v. McCane, 573 F.3d 1037, 1047 (10th Cir.2009) (Tymkovich, J., dissenting) (same), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1686 , 176 L.Ed.2d 179 (2010) with United States v. Rozier, 598 F.3d 768 , 771 n. 6 (11th Cir.2010) (stating this language is not dicta), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3399 , 177 L.Ed.2d 313 (2010), and United States v. Vongxay, 594 F.3d 1111, 1115 (9th Cir.2010) (same).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James McBroom
See also United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459, 468 (4th Cir.2009), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1686 , 176 L.Ed.2d 186 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Scott Kerns
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 09-305.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 179
Published
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.