green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Branch v. Howard
Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), when a state court has “adjudicated a claim on the merits,” we may grant relief only if the state court’s decision “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States” or “resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d); see also Matthews v. Workman, 577 F.3d 1175, 1180 (10th Cir.2009), c…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gary Ervin
v.
Ohio
v.
Ohio
No. 09-8677.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 378
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County, denied.