US Infrastructure, Inc. v. United States, 176 L. Ed. 2d 368 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
US Infrastructure, Inc. v. United States, 176 L. Ed. 2d 368 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“rule 404(b) does not apply when the other act evidence is linked in time and circumstances with the charged crime and concerns the context, motive or setup of the crime; or forms an integral part of the crime; or is necessary to complete the story of the crime.”
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Brandon Ware (ca11, 2011-03-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Brandon Ware
11th Cir. · 2011 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
rule 404(b) does not apply when the other act evidence is linked in time and circumstances with the charged crime and concerns the context, motive or setup of the crime; or forms an integral part of the crime; or is necessary to complete the story of the crime.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Aurora Ramentol
11th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the evidence need not be inconsistent with every hypothesis other than guilt, as the jury is free to choose among reasonable constructions of the evidence.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Leniart
Conn. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Curl, 46 Cal. 4th 339, 360 , 207 P.3d 2 , 93 Cal. Rptr. 3d 537 (2009) (trial court did not abuse discretion in precluding expert testimony on methods used by jailhouse informants to fabricate testimony), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1009 , 130 S. Ct. 1881 , 176 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Leniart
Conn. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Curl, 46 Cal. 4th 339, 360 , 207 P.3d 2 , 93 Cal. Rptr. 3d 537 (2009) (trial court did not abuse discretion in precluding expert testimony on methods used by jailhouse informants to fabricate testimony), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1009 , 130 S. Ct. 1881 , 176 L.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Nelson Martinez Almeida
11th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. U.S. Infrastructure, Inc., 576 F.3d 1195, 1210 (11th Cir.2009), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1918 , 176 L.Ed.2d 368 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
US Infrastructure, Inc.
v.
United States
No. 09-967.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 368
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 88%
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 576 F.3d 1195.