Scarborough v. Dillard's, Inc., 179 L. Ed. 2d 1211 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Scarborough v. Dillard's, Inc., 179 L. Ed. 2d 1211 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Simmons, Jr. v. Wiles (nceb, 2021-10-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Simmons, Jr. v. Wiles
Bankr. E.D.N.C. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Scarborough v. Dillards, Inc., 363 N.C. 715, 722-23 , 693 S.E.2d 640, 644-45 (2009), cert. denied, 563 U.S. 988 , 131 S. Ct. 2456 , 179 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Cully's Motorcross Park, Inc. (2×)
N.C. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Scarborough v. Dillard’s, Inc., 363 N.C. 715, 722 , 693 S.E.2d 640, 644 (2009), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 131 S. Ct. 2456 (2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Many Cultures, One Message v. Jim Clements
9th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
To determine whether a party has sufficient injury to support Article III standing in the First Amendment context, we look to “whether the plaintiffs have articulated a ‘concrete plan’ to violate the law in question, whether the prosecuting authorities have communicated a specific warning or threat to initiate proceedings, and the history of past prosecution or enforcement under the challenged statute.” Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Comm’n, 220 F.3d 1134 , 1139 (9th Cir.2000) (en bane); see also Canatella v. California, 304 F.3d 843 , 854 n. 14 (9th Cir.2002) (looking to a party�…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Many Cultures, One Message v. Jim Clements
9th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Quist, Senior United States District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation. 2 authorities have communicated a specific warning or threat to initiate proceedings, and the history of past prosecution or enforcement under the challenged statute.” Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Comm’n, 220 F.3d 1134 , 1139 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc); see also Canatella v. California, 304 F.3d 843 , 854 n.14 (9th Cir. 2002) (looking to a party’s “history” and “continuing activities” in the area, as well as to the “nature” of the party’s legal challenge). “[P]laint…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bernard Scarborough
v.
Dillard's, Inc., fka Dillard Department Stores, Inc.
No. 10-1135.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 2011.
179 L. Ed. 2d 1211
Published

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina denied.

Same case below, 363 N.C. 715, 693 S.E.2d 640.