Ayala v. United States, 178 L. Ed. 2d 173 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Ayala v. United States, 178 L. Ed. 2d 173 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Wardsworth (mass, 2019-06-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Wardsworth
Mass. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ramos-González , 664 F.3d 1 , 5 (1st Cir. 2011), quoting United States v. Ayala , 601 F.3d 256 , 275 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 910 , 131 S.Ct. 262 , 178 L.Ed.2d 173 (2010) (inquiry is whether "expert is, in essence, [giving an independent judgment or] merely acting as a transmitter for testimonial hearsay").
cited Cited "see" Beyle v. United States
E.D. Va. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ayala, 601 F.3d 256, 264-65 (4th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 910 , 131 S.Ct. 262 , 178 L.Ed.2d 173 (2010) (setting out the framework for utilizing the Blockburger test).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Santos Garcia
4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ayala, 601 F.3d 256 (4th *911 Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 262 , 178 L.Ed.2d 173 (2010). 1 Here, Garcia fails to point to any testimony offered by the expert that was improper or in violation of the Confrontation Clause or the rule announced in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Clifton Washington
4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id. at 60 n. 9, 124 S.Ct. 1354 (“The Clause ... does not bar the use of testimonial statements for purposes other than establishing the truth of the matter asserted.” (citing Tennessee v. Street, 471 U.S. 409, 414 , 105 S.Ct. 2078 , 85 L.Ed.2d 425 (1985))); Fed.R.Evid. 801(c) (defining an out-of-court statement as hearsay if it is “offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted”); see also United States v. Ayala, 601 F.3d 256, 272 (4th Cir.2010) (“Crawford is quite explicit that the Confrontation Clause does not eliminate the use of testimonial statements across th…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gabriel Perez-Amaya
4th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Ayala, 601 F.3d 256, 274 (4th Cir.) cert. denied, - U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 262 , 178 L.Ed.2d 173 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Edgar Ayala
v.
United States
No. 10-5230.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2010.
178 L. Ed. 2d 173
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 601 F.3d 256.