Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Daugaard, 180 L. Ed. 2d 845 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Daugaard, 180 L. Ed. 2d 845 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“comstock ii”
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Gerald Timms (ca4, 2012-01-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Gerald Timms
4th Cir. · 2012 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
comstock ii
cited Cited "see" The American Civil Liberties U v. Catherine Masto
9th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Begay, 622 F.3d 1187, 1190 (9th Cir.2010), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 3026 , 180 L.Ed.2d 852 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Baker (2×)
9th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
Parrott, 992 F.2d at 920 ; see United States v. Begay, 622 F.3d 1187, 1193 (9th Cir.2010) (“We review issues pertaining to statutory interpretation and constitutional law de novo.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 3026 , 180 L.Ed.2d 852 , and — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 3027 , 180 L.Ed.2d 852 (2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Daniel OO.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Rather, the purpose of such evidence is “to show [a respondent’s] mental condition and to predict future behavior,” an assessment that revolves around the psychiatric interpretation of that conduct (Allen v Illinois, 478 US at 371 ; see Kansas v Hendricks, 521 US at 362 ; Addington v Texas, 441 US at 428 ; see also United States v Comstock, 627 F3d 513, 523-524 [2010], cert denied 564 US —, 131 S Ct 3026 [2011]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yankton Sioux Tribe
v.
Dennis Daugaard, Governor of South Dakota
No. 10-1058.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 2011.
180 L. Ed. 2d 845
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 606 F.3d 994.