Hatch v. Parker, 181 L. Ed. 2d 174 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Hatch v. Parker, 181 L. Ed. 2d 174 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “We now join every other circuit to have considered the question and conclude that the plain language of the ATSA preempts application of the Rehabilitation Act to security screeners.”
3 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Field v. Napolitano (ca1, 2011-11-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Field v. Napolitano
1st Cir. · 2011 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
we now join every other circuit to have considered the question and conclude that the plain language of the atsa preempts application of the rehabilitation act to security screeners.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vincent Hatch
v.
Tony Parker, Warden
No. 11-5270.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 174
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.