Fox v. Wardy, 181 L. Ed. 2d 262 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Fox v. Wardy, 181 L. Ed. 2d 262 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Douglas C. (conn, 2023-01-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Douglas C.
Conn. · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Jodi D., 340 Conn. 463 , 476, 264 A.3d 509 (2021) (constitutional issue presents legal question subject to de novo review); see also United States v. Newell, 658 F.3d 1, 20 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 955 , 132 S. Ct. 430 , 181 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Douglas C.
Conn. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Jodi D., 340 Conn. 463 , 476, 264 A.3d 509 (2021) (constitutional issue presents legal question sub- ject to de novo review); see also United States v. Newell, 658 F.3d 1, 20 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 955 , 132 S. Ct. 430 , 181 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Kenneth Kyle
9th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Smith, 640 F.3d 580, 586 (4th Cir.2011) cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 430 , 181 L.Ed.2d 279 (2011) (defendant did not "waived the issue of the voluntariness of his guilty plea by failing to renew the objection as he entered that plea” where he had already repeatedly objected that he could not sign the plea agreement without meaningful representation); United States v. Esquivel-Ortega, 484 F.3d 1221, 1225 (9th Cir.2007) (defendant need not renew his motion for acquittal because any renewal would be futile in light of the court’s denial “a few moments earlie…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Irving (2×)
10th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Furthermore, when a rule of law has been decided adversely to one or more codefendants, the law of the case doctrine precludes all other codefendants from relitigating the legal issue" (citation omitted) (quoting Alvarez, 142 F.3d at 1247 ; United States v. Aramony, 166 F.3d 655, 661 (4th Cir. 1999)) (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also United States v. Wardell, 591 F.3d 1279 , 1306 n. 16 (10th Cir.2009) ("Our analysis and rulings in [Mr. Wardell's codefendant's case] apply with full force to Mr. Wardell's arguments and are law of the case"), cert. *1193 denied, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John Fox
v.
Joe Wardy
No. 11-283.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 262
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, denied.

Same case below, 318 S.W.3d 449.