Rausch v. United States, 181 L. Ed. 2d 309 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Rausch v. United States, 181 L. Ed. 2d 309 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: West Valley City v. Walljasper (utahctapp, 2012-09-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." West Valley City v. Walljasper
Utah Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Finally, some of these decisions turn on whether the defendant's objection to the timing of allocution has been properly preserved. 6 See Frost, 684 F.3d at 979 ; see also United States v. Rausch, 638 F.3d 1296, 1301 (10th Cir.2011) (declining to exercise plain error review because the trial court's failure to ask the defendant personally whether he wanted to speak at sentencing did "not seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings"), cert. dismissed, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 474 , 181 L.Ed.2d 309 (2011). {17 Keeping these factors in mind, we return to our …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ralph Rausch
v.
United States
No. 11-133 (R46-001).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 19, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 309
Published

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 638 F.3d 1296.