Sczygelski v. United States Customs & Border Prot. Agency, 181 L. Ed. 2d 552 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Sczygelski v. United States Customs & Border Prot. Agency, 181 L. Ed. 2d 552 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“we ordinarily review sentences for procedural error and for substantive reasonableness, applying an abuse of discretion standard.”
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Walter Teel (ca5, 2012-08-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Walter Teel
5th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
we ordinarily review sentences for procedural error and for substantive reasonableness, applying an abuse of discretion standard.
cited Cited "see" Sczygelski v. United States Office of Special Counsel
D.D.C. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sczygelski v. Customs & Border Protection Agency, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 857 , 181 L.Ed.2d 552 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Douglas Sczygelski
v.
United States Customs and Border Protection Agency
No. 11-574.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 12, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 552
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 419 Fed. Appx. 680.