green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
McDaniel v. Arnold
See Williams v. State, 417 Md. 479, 486 , 10 A.3d 1167, 1171-72 (2011) (stating that Maryland’s regulatory scheme for handgun possession “expressly permits wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun in the home,” without the requirement of licensure), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 93 , 181 L.Ed.2d 22 (2011); accord Wieland v. State, 101 Md.App. 1, 29 , 643 A.2d 446, 459-60 (1994) (same, interpreting earlier codification). 9 Mr. McDaniel intended to take I-95 South through the Fort McHenry Tunnel en route to Cockeysville.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stephen Dearth v. Loretta E. Lynch
(2×)
Compare People v. Aguilar, 2 N.E.3d 321, 327 (Ill. 2013) (agreeing with Moore), with Williams v. State, 10 A.3d 1167, 1177 (Md.) (“If the Supreme Court . . . meant its holding to extend beyond home possession, it will need to say so more plainly.”), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 93 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re the Application for a New Jersey Permit to Carry a Handgun by Pantano
See, e.g., Williams v. State, 417 Md. 479 , 10 A.3d 1167, 1169, 1177 (2011) (holding that a statute prohibiting carrying a handgun outside the home without a permit was not at odds with Heller or McDonald), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 93 , 181 L.Ed.2d 22 (2011); Commonwealth v. Perez, 80 Mass.App.Ct. 271 , 952 N.E.2d 441, 451 (2011) (“The Second Amendment does not protect the defendant in this case because he was in possession of the firearm outside his home.”); see also Dorr v. Weber, 741 F.Supp.2d 993, 1004-05 (N.D.Iowa 2010) (“The Court’s recognition, in Heller, that prohibi…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AT&T, Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 10-1204.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 22
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Same case below, 629 F.3d 505.