Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 568 U.S. 1224 (2013). · Go Syfert
Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 568 U.S. 1224 (2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ricky Langley v. Howard Prince, Warden (ca5, 2019-06-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ricky Langley v. Howard Prince, Warden
5th Cir. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See James v. Ryan , 679 F.3d 780 , 802 (9th Cir. 2012) (finding waiver of argument that state courts adjudicated the ineffective assistance of counsel claims on the merits and that AEDPA's relitigation bar thus applied to them), cert. granted, judgment vacated, and remanded by Ryan v. James , 568 U.S. 1224 , 133 S.Ct. 1579 , 185 L.Ed.2d 572 (2013).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Doe v. ESA P Portfolio LLC
W.D. Wash. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
Pictures Corp., 679 F.3d 1121 , 1130 12 (9th Cir. 2012) (“We generally do not consider issues raised for the first time during oral 13 argument, unless failure to do so would result in manifest injustice and the appellee would not be 14 prejudiced by such consideration.”) (citation modified); see also James v. Ryan, 679 F.3d 780 , 15 804 (9th Cir. 2012), cert. granted, judgment vacated on other grounds, 568 U.S. 1224 , (2013) 16 (“When a party raises a distinct argument for the first time at oral argument before us, not having 17 briefed it at all, we normally consider that argument waiv…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adoptive Couple
v.
Baby Girl, a Minor Child Under the Age of 14 Years
No. 12-399.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 15, 2013.
568 U.S. 1224
Published

Sup. Ct. S. C. [Certio-rari granted, ante, p. 1081.] Motion of petitioners for leave to file joint appendix under seal denied without prejudice to filing a renewed motion together with either a redacted joint appendix or an explanation as to why the joint appendix may not be redacted within 14 days.