Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins., Co., 569 U.S. 917 (2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins., Co., 569 U.S. 917 (2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“it is implausible that the would have gone through the cumbersome process of amending its regulation ... only to re-amend the regula 228 tion after this ease is resolved”
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Linchpins of Liberty v. United States of America (dcd, 2014-10-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Linchpins of Liberty v. United States of America
D.D.C. · 2014 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
it is implausible that the would have gone through the cumbersome process of amending its regulation ... only to re-amend the regulation after this case is resolved....
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) True the Vote, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service
D.D.C. · 2014 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
it is implausible that the would have gone through the cumbersome process of amending its regulation ... only to re-amend the regula 228 tion after this ease is resolved
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Julie HEIMESHOFF
v.
HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE, CO.
No. 12–729..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 2013.
569 U.S. 917
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 84%
Citer courts: District of Columbia (2)

[*1803] Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.