green
Positive treatment
10.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: Patrick Lazzari
(2×)
The United States Supreme Court has 22 held that defalcation has a specific meaning that requires “bad 23 faith, moral turpitude, or other immoral conduct,” or “an 24 intentional wrong.” Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A., 133 S. Ct. 25 1754, 1759-60 (2013). 26 B.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: Patrick Lazzari
(2×)
The United States Supreme Court has 22 held that defalcation has a specific meaning that requires “bad 23 faith, moral turpitude, or other immoral conduct,” or “an 24 intentional wrong.” Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A., 133 S. Ct. 25 1754, 1759-60 (2013). 26 B.
cited
Cited "see"
Sec. Investor Prot. Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC
See *474 Velvel v. Picard, 567 U.S. 934 , 133 S.Ct. 25 , 183 L.Ed.2d 675 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (In re Madoff)
(B & P Memo at 25-28.) “A ‘Ponzi scheme’ typically describes a pyramid scheme where earlier investors are paid from the investments of more recent investors, rather thandrom any underlying business concern, until the scheme ceases to attract new investors and the pyramid collapses.” Eberhard v. Marcu, 530 F.3d 122 , 132 n. 7 (2d Cir.2008); accord In re BLMIS, 654 F.3d 229, 232 (2d Cir.2011) (“Net Equity Decision”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 25 , 183 L.Ed.2d 675 (2012); see United States v. Moloney, 287 F.3d 236, 242 (2d Cir.) (“A Ponzi scheme by definition uses the pu…
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (In re Madoff)
See Net Equity Decision, 424 B.R. 122 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2010), aff 'd 654 F.3d 229 (2d Cir. 2011), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 24 , 183 L.Ed.2d 675 (2012), — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 25 , 183 L.Ed.2d 675 (2012). 7 At such time, both this Court and the Second Circuit explicitly declined to address the issue of whether the Net Investment Method should be adjusted to account for Time-Based Damages.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lawrence R. VELVEL
v.
Irving H. PICARD
v.
Irving H. PICARD
No. 11-986.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jun 25, 2012.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.