Kidd v. Livingston, 567 U.S. 939 (2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Kidd v. Livingston, 567 U.S. 939 (2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the importance of the written benefit plan is not inviolable, but is subject - based upon equitable doctrines and principles - to modification and, indeed, even equitable reformation under 11321(a)(3)”
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Deborah Kenseth v. Dean Health Plan, Incorporated (ca7, 2013-06-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Deborah Kenseth v. Dean Health Plan, Incorporated (2×)
7th Cir. · 2013 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
the importance of the written benefit plan is not inviolable, but is subject - based upon equitable doctrines and principles - to modification and, indeed, even equitable reformation under 11321(a)(3)
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kidd
v.
Livingston, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice
No. 11-9940.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 25, 2012.
567 U.S. 939
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2)

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.