discussed Cited "see" United States v. Allen Gibbs See United States v. Chandia, 675 F.3d 329, 341-42 (4th Cir.) (recognizing that a sentencing court is “not required to provide a lengthy explanation or robotically tick through § 3553(a)’s every subsection, particularly when imposing a below-Guidelines sentence” (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted)), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 609 , 184 L.Ed.2d 397 (2012).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Rances Amaya See United States v. Chandia, 675 F.3d 329, 342 (4th Cir.) (“comparing the sentences of other defendants with dissimilar offenses, circumstances, and criminal histories is unavailing”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 609 , 184 L.Ed.2d 397 (2012).