green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.0 score
“he ultimate legal question of whether a reasonable person would have considered there to be a high likelihood of infringement of a valid patent should always be decided as a matter of law by the judge.”
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2013
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Masimo Corp. v. Philips Electronic North America Corp.
he ultimate legal question of whether a reasonable person would have considered there to be a high likelihood of infringement of a valid patent should always be decided as a matter of law by the judge.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ssl Services, LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc.
(2×)
See Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. *1091 Gore & Assocs., 682 F.3d 1003, 1005-08 (Fed.Cir.2012), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 932 , 184 L.Ed.2d 752 (2013).
cited
Cited "see"
Szulik v. Tagliaferri
See Bigio v. Coca-Cola Co., 675 F.3d 163, 177 (2d Cir.2012), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 952 , 184 L.Ed.2d 752 (2013).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.
Co., 313 U.S. 487, 496-97 , 61 S.Ct. 1020 , 85 L.Ed. 1477 (1941)); see also Bigio v. Coca-Cola Co., 675 F.3d 163, 169 (2d Cir.2012) (“In cases where jurisdiction is based on the diversity of the parties’ citizenship, a federal court will apply the choice-of-law rules of the forum state, which is New York in this instance.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 952 , 184 L.Ed.2d 752 (2013).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
v.
C. R. Bard, Inc.
v.
C. R. Bard, Inc.
No. 12-458.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 14, 2013.
C. A. Fed. Cir. Motions of Ananda M. Chakrabarty and E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.
Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and this petition.