green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
14.9 score
“a modern machine gun can fire more than i,000 rounds per minute, allowing a shooter to kill dozens of people within a matter of seconds. short of bombs, missiles, and biochemical agents, we can conceive of few weapons that are more dangerous than machine guns.”
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2013
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. One (1) Palmetto State Armory PA-15 MacHinegun Receiver/Frame
a modern machine gun can fire more than i,000 rounds per minute, allowing a shooter to kill dozens of people within a matter of seconds. short of bombs, missiles, and biochemical agents, we can conceive of few weapons that are more dangerous than machine guns.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ohio State Conference of the National Ass'n v. Husted
if the district court's account is 'plausible in light of the record viewed in its entirety, the court of appeals may not reverse.
discussed
Cited "see"
Matusick v. Erie Cnty. Water Auth.
In this case, however, inasmuch as the ECWA would not be entitled to qualified immunity for any constitutional violation under Monell, 436 challenged action to believe his acts were lawful.ʺ Taravella v. Town of Wolcott, 599 F.3d 129, 134 (2d Cir. 2010) (some internal quotation marks omitted); accord Southerland v. City of N.Y., 680 F.3d 127 , 141‐42 (2012), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 980 (2013).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matusick v. Erie County Water Authority
(2×)
This Court has at times placed a further gloss on these principles, stating that “[e]ven where the law is ‘clearly established’ and the scope of an official's permissible conduct is 'clearly defined,’ the qualified immunity defense also protects an official if it was ‘objectively reasonable’ for him at the time of the challenged action to believe his acts were lawful.” Taravella v. Town of Wolcott, 599 F.3d 129, 134 (2d Cir.2010) (some internal quotation marks omitted); accord Southerland v. City of N.Y., 680 F.3d 127, 141-42 (2012), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 980 , 184 L.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Matusick v. Erie County Water Authority
(2×)
This Court has at times placed a further gloss on these principles, stating that "[e]ven where the law is 'clearly established’ and the scope of an official’s permissible conduct is 'clearly defined,' the qualified immunity defense also protects an official if it was 'objectively reasonable’ for him at the time of the challenged action to believe his acts were lawful.” Taravella v. Town of Wolcott, 599 F.3d 129, 134 (2d Cir.2010) (some internal quotation marks omitted); accord Southerland v. City of N.Y., 680 F.3d 127, 141-42 (2012), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 980 , 184 L.Ed.2d 7…
discussed
Cited "see"
Matusick v. Erie Cnty. Water Auth.
In this case, however, inasmuch as the ECWA would not be entitled to qualified immunity for any constitutional violation under Monell, 436 U.S. at 690‐91, see Owen, 445 U.S. at 650 , we must in any event decide the nature 599 F.3d 129, 134 (2d Cir. 2010) (some internal quotation marks omitted); accord Southerland v. City of N.Y., 680 F.3d 127 , 141‐42 (2012), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 980 (2013).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gawlik v. Semple
(2×)
Ed. 2d 1043 (1998); see also Southerland v. City of New York, 680 F.3d 127 , 142–43 (2d Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 568 U.S. 1150 , 133 S. Ct. 980 , 184 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Adrian Roberts v. State
Compare United States v. Proctor, 489 F.3d 1348, 1353-54 (D.C.Cir.2007) (interpreting Ber-tine to hold that a reasonable, standard police procedure must govern the decision to impound and that when such a procedure exists, the police’s failure to adhere to it is unreasonable and violates the Fourth Amendment), with United States v. Smith, 522 F.3d 305, 312 (3rd Cir.) (observing that “the adoption of a standardized impoundment procedure merely supplies a methodology by which reasonableness can be judged and tends to ensure that the police will not make arbitrary decisions in determining whi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Matthews
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. McKinnon, 681 F.3d 203, 206 (5th Cir.2012), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 980 , 184 L.Ed.2d 764 (2013).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of New York, New York
v.
Southerland
v.
Southerland
No. 12-215.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 2013.
Consideration, Motion, Took.
Cited by 17 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1) · Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of National Association of Social Workers et al. for leave to file brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.
Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.