green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.9 score
“although the supreme court has offered inconsistent guidance about how feres should be applied ... we have consistently emphasized the third rationale.”
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ortiz Ex Rel. I.O. v. United States
although the supreme court has offered inconsistent guidance about how feres should be applied ... we have consistently emphasized the third rationale.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adams v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Burden v. Shinseki, 727 F.3d 1161, 1171 (Fed.Cir.) (The Federal Circuit cited Russello v. United States and held that since 38 U.S.C. § 103 (a) granted the VA authority determine, by “evidence satisfactory to the Secretary,” what is a “marriage,” the lack of that same language in a later provision, section 103(e), meant that the VA had to defer to state law and could not set its own evidentiary standards for what is a marriage.), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied (Fed.Cir.2013), cer t. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 2134 , 188 L.Ed.2d 1124 (2014); Sioux Honey Ass’n v. H…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michele D. BURDEN
v.
Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and Helen C. Coleman v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veteran Affairs.
v.
Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and Helen C. Coleman v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veteran Affairs.
No. 13–762..
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 5, 2014.
134 S. Ct. 2134
Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)
Case below, 727 F.3d 1161.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.