green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Woods
(2×)
An appellate court reviews a trial court’s findings of fact for “clear error.” 1 Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 , 242, 121 S.Ct. 1452 , 149 L.Ed.2d 430 (2001); see United States v. Olsen, 704 F.3d 1172, 1190 (9th Cir.2013) (ultimate determination of actual bias is reviewed for clear error), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2711 , 189 L.Ed.2d 743 (2014); United States v. Powell, 226 F.3d 1181, 1188 (10th Cir.2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Woods
It is “plainly [a question] of historical fact; did a juror swear that he could set aside any opinion he might hold and decide the case on the evidence, and should the juror’s protestation of impartiality have been believed.” Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025, 1036 (1984). 4 United States v. Woods, No. 14-0783/NA An appellate court reviews a trial court’s findings of fact for “clear error.” 1 Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 , 242 (2001); see United States v. Olsen, 704 F.3d 1172, 1190 (9th Cir. 2013) (ultimate determination of actual bias is reviewed for clear error), cert. denied, …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ramon WILLIAMSON
v.
Ray HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections.
v.
Ray HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections.
No. 13–9753..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 2014.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.