Shipley v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2842 (2014). · Go Syfert
Shipley v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2842 (2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“harmless error exists where ... the properly admitted and uncontradicted evidence of guilt was so overwhelming and the prejudicial effect of the error was so insignificant by comparison that the error could not have contributed to the verdict.”
76 citation events (76 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Frein, E., Aplt. (pa, 2019-04-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Frein, E., Aplt.
Pa. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
t was still incumbent upon appellant to object and to give the trial court the option of a corrective measure.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State Of Washington v. Jared Schauble
Wash. Ct. App. · 2015 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
neither the constitutional text, the historical treatment of the confrontation right, nor the current implications of adopting a broader confrontation right support an independent reading of article i, section 22 in this case.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Hitcho, G., Aplt. (2×)
Pa. · 2015 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
harmless error exists where ... the properly admitted and uncontradicted evidence of guilt was so overwhelming and the prejudicial effect of the error was so insignificant by comparison that the error could not have contributed to the verdict.
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Brown, W., Jr.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ballard, 80 A.3d 380, 400 (Pa. 2013), (holding appellant’s arguments were waived because appellant failed to object at trial), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2842 (2014); see also Pa.R.E. 103(a). -8- J-S17007-21 In sum, Appellant neither obtains relief on his weight claim that the officers’ trial testimony was unreliable and incredible, nor on his evidentiary challenge to the in-court identification by Officer Morar.
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Boyer, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ballard, 80 A.3d 380, 400 (Pa. 2013), (holding appellant’s arguments were waived because appellant failed to object at trial), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2842 (2014); see also Pa.R.E. 103(a).
discussed Cited "see" Benavidez v. Shutiva
N.M. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Myers v. Koopman, 738 F.3d 1190 , 1194 9 (10th Cir. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2842 (2014) (“Unreasonable seizures 10 imposed with legal process precipitate Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution 11 claims.”); Mondragon v. Thompson, 519 F.3d 1078, 1083 (10th Cir. 2008) (“This 12 Circuit . . . has held that the [United States] Constitution permits [procedural] due 13 process claims for wrongful imprisonment after the wrongful institution of legal 14 process.”). 15 Fourteenth Amendment 16 {18} “The Fourteenth Amendment protects individuals against deprivations of 17 liberty wi…
discussed Cited "see" Benavidez v. Shutiva
N.M. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Myers v. Koopman, 738 F.3d 1190, 1194 (10th Cir. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2842 (2014) (“Unreasonable seizures imposed with legal process precipitate Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claims.”); Mondragon v. Thompson, 519 F.3d 1078, 1083 (10th Cir. 2008) (“This Circuit . . . has held that the [United States] Constitution permits [procedural] due process claims for wrongful imprisonment after the wrongful institution of legal process.”).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Ashmunn, P.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ballard, 80 A.3d 380, 400 (Pa.2013) cert. denied, 134 S.Ct. 2842 (2014) (holding appellant’s arguments were waived because appellant failed to object at trial).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Brown, P. (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ballard obliged to issue the charge that appellant pro cert. denied, Ballard v. Pennsylvania, 134 S. Ct. 2842 (2014).
cited Cited "see" Shue v. Lampert
10th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Myers v. Koopman, 738 F.3d 1190, 1193 (10th Cir.2013), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 2842 , — L.Ed.2d - (2014).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John Thomas SHIPLEY
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 13–9231..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 2014.
134 S. Ct. 2842

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.