discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Nicholas Schofield we review the district court's legal conclusions, however, de novo.

discussed Cited "see" Dietz v. Bouldin See Wagner v. Jones, 758 F.3d 1030 , 1034-1035 (C.A.8 2014), cert. denied, 575 U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 1529 , 191 L.Ed.2d 558 (2015) ; United States v. Figueroa, 683 F.3d 69 , 72-73 (C.A.3 2012) ; United States v. Rojas, 617 F.3d 669 , 677-678 (C.A.2 2010) ; United States v. Marinari, 32 F.3d 1209 , 1214 (C.A.7 1994) ; Summers v. United States, 11 F.2d 583 , 585-587 (C.A.4 1926).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Booker Rogers See United States v. Gonzalez-Medina, 757 F.3d 425 (5th Cir.2014), ce rt. denied, — U.S. ——, 135 S.Ct. 1529 , 191 L.Ed.2d 562 (2015).

discussed Cited "see" Rocky Dietz v. Hillary Bouldin (2×) See Wagner v. Jones, 758 F.3d 1030, 1034 (8th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 1529 (2015) (“One line of authority . . . requires a case- specific analysis of ‘whether the jurors became susceptible to outside influences and [were] beyond the control of the court once discharged.’” (quoting Figueroa, 683 F.3d at 73 )).