green
Positive treatment
8.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Com. v. Lynn, W.
Before excusing the jury that day, the trial court further instructed: “I will tell you right now and I will remind you again tomorrow, that to the extent that you heard from any of the attorneys anything of a personal opinion and that is not, in fact, supported by the evidence of record, then you are to disregard it.” Id. at 255.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hagar v. Zaidman
Maintenance of the suit in the forum state cannot “offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.’ ” International Shoe Co., v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 , 66 *135 S.Ct. 154, 158, 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945), quoting Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. 457, 463 , 61 S.Ct. 339, 342 , 85 L.Ed. 278 (1940).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Sanchez, A.
See Commonwealth v. Sanchez, 623 Pa. 253 , 82 A.3d 943 (2013), cert. denied, 574 U.S. 860 , 135 S.Ct. 154 , 190 L.Ed.2d 113 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Bell, M.
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Sanchez, 82 A.3d 943, 984 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied, 135 S.Ct. 154 (2014).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Mickens, R.
See Commonwealth v. Sanchez, 82 A.3d 943, 984 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied, 135 S.Ct. 154 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Satcher, R.
See Commonwealth v. Sanchez, 82 A.3d 943, 984 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied, 135 S.Ct. 154 (2014); see also Commonwealth v. Lyons, 568 A.2d 1266, 12698 (Pa. Super. 1989), appeal denied, 583 A.2d 792 (Pa. 1990) (concluding counsel was not ineffective where appellant failed to show that “the absence of a preliminary hearing in any way undermined the truth determining process so as to render unreliable this trial court’s finding of guilty.”); Commonwealth v. Bowman, 325 A.2d 818, 819 (Pa. Super. 1971) (holding issues regarding preliminary hearing not appealable where appellant entered voluntary …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Jeffrey Rodney BERRY
No. 13–10657..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2014.
Published
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperisdenied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992)(per curiam).