green
Positive treatment
11.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Taupier
(2×)
See United States v. Martinez , 736 F.3d 981 , 987 (11th Cir. 2013) (under Black , "intimidation is but *18 one type of true threat," and court did not intend to require specific intent to intimidate for all true threats), vacated on other grounds, --- U.S. ----, 135 S. Ct. 2798 , 192 L.Ed. 2d 842 (2015) ; United States v. Jeffries , 692 F.3d 473 , 480 (6th Cir. 2012) (stating that court in Black merely observed "that intimidation is one type of true threat" [emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 571 U.S. 817 , 134 S.Ct. 59 , 187 L.Ed.2d 25 (2013) ; **172 Peo…
cited
Cited "see"
Bradley v. State
See Luis v. United States, —- U.S. --, 135 S.Ct. 2798 , 192 L.Ed.2d 846 (2015) (granting petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State Of Washington v. Jessica Linda Kohonen
See United States v. Martinez, 736 F.3d 981, 986 (11th Cir. 2013) (“Black did not work a ‘sea change,’ tacitly overruling decades of case law by importing a requirement of subjective intent into all threat-prohibiting statutes.”), vacated on remand, 800 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2015) (vacated after remand by United States Supreme Court, 135 S. Ct. 2798 (2015), in light of the statutory holding in Elonis v. United States, 575 U.S. _ , 135 S. Ct. 2001 , 192 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mann
See Luis v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2798 , 192 L.Ed.2d 846 (2015) (granting certiorari in a case involving forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 1345 , which specifically allows for pretrial restraint of substitute property, to resolve a circuit split on whether the restraint of untainted assets needed to retain counsel of choice in a criminal case violates the Fifth and Sixth Amendments), .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ellisa Martinez
See Martinez v. United States, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 2798 , — L.Ed.2d - (2015).
cited
Cited "see"
Bank of America Bank, NA v. Yvonne Roberts Waits
See Bank of Am., N.A. v. Waits, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2798 , — L.Ed.3d - (2015).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bruce Wright v. City of St. Petersburg, Florida
See Wash. State Grange, 552 U.S. at 449 & n.6, 128 S.Ct. at 1190 & n.6; see also United States v. Martinez, 736 F.3d 981, 991 (11th Cir. 2013) (Carnes, C.J., concurring) (stating that the difference between a regular facial challenge and an over-breadth challenge is “having to show that all applications of the statute are unconstitutional and having to show that a substantial number of them are”), (emphasis added), vacated on other grounds, Martinez v. United States, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 2798 , 192 L.Ed.2d 842 (2015).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
v.
Yvonne Roberts WAITS
v.
Yvonne Roberts WAITS
No. 14-580.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 8, 2015.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Petition for writ of cer-tiorari granted. Judgment vacated,' and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Bank of America, N.A. v. Caulkett, 575 U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1995, 192 L.ED.2d 52 (2015).