green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Panchita Hernandez-Ybarra
See United States v. Cedillo-Narvaez, 761 F.3d 397, 402 (5th Cir.), cert denied — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 764 , 190 L.Ed.2d 636 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Enrique Mendez
See United States v. Cedillo-Narvaez, 761 F.3d 397, 401-02 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 764 , 190 L.Ed.2d 636 (2014); United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.2005). *431 “[W]hen a sentencing judge imposes a properly calculated Guidelines sentence, ‘[this court] will give great deference to that sentence.’” United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006) (quoting Mares, 402 F.3d at 520 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fredy Borjas-Ramos
See United States v. Cedillo-Narvaez, 761 F.3d 397, 401-02 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 764 , 190 L.Ed.2d 636 (2014); United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.2005). “[W]hen a sentencing judge imposes a properly calculated Guidelines sentence, ‘[this court] will give great deference to that sentence.’ ” United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006) (quoting Mares, 402 F.3d at 520 ).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gabriel Rivera-Gonzalez
See United States v. Cedillo-Narvaez, 761 F.3d 397, 401 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 764 , 190 L.Ed.2d 636 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin Iglesias-Cruz
See United States v. Cubero, 754 F.3d 888, 892 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 764 , 190 L.Ed.2d 636 (2014) (explaining that the district court may attach great weight to one factor over others).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dewarren Antoine Lewis
See United States v. Cubero, 754 F.3d 888, 900 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 764 , 190 L.Ed.2d 636 (2014).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Samuel T. RUSSELL
v.
CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS.
v.
CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS.
No. 14–498..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 2014.
135 S. Ct. 764
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District denied.