green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
20.0 score
“here is no logical reason why there should be a readily available alternative requirement in facial challenges to lethal injection protocols but hot to as-applied challenges to them.”
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Arthur v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
(2×)
here is no logical reason why there should be a readily available alternative requirement in facial challenges to lethal injection protocols but not to as-applied challenges to them.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Scholl v. Mnuchin
And second, the 24 action must be one by which rights or obligations have been determined, or from which 25 legal consequences will flow.” U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs v. Hawkes Co., 136 S. Ct. 26 1807, 1813 (2016) (quoting Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154 , 177–78 (1997)); Or.
cited
Cited "see"
Benson Mills Inc v. Deng
See Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 136 S. Ct. 26 1979, 1988-1989 (2016).
discussed
Cited "see"
Molina-Martinez v. United States
(2×)
See 576 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 26 , 192 L.Ed.2d 998 (2015).
cited
Cited "see"
Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Zaragoza-Gomez
See El Pueblo de P.R. v. Sánchez Valle, 192 D.P.R. 594 (P.R.2015), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 28 , 192 L.Ed.2d 998 (2015).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alejandro Garcia-Lagunas
(2×)
See Molina-Martinez, 136 S.Ct. 26 (2015); Petition for Certiorari, Molina-Martinez v. United States, 2015 WL 5766728 at *i (No. 14-8913).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Levon Dean, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Taylor, 754 F.3d 217 (4th Cir.2014), ce rt. granted, - U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 26 , 192 L.Ed.2d 998 (Oct. 1, 2015) (granting certiorari on the issue of whether the government can meet the interstate commerce element by relying exclusively on evidence that the robbery of a drug dealer is an inherent •economic enterprise that satisfies the interstate commerce element of the offense).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eric Putnam
(2×)
See United States v. *856 Molina Martinez, 588 Fed.Appx. 333 (5th Cir.2014), ce rt. granted., -U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 26 , 192 L.Ed.2d 998 (2015).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Decheri Hafer v. Unknown
Alvarez v. Hill, 518 F.3d 1152, 1155 (9th Cir. 2008) (“Failure to show 12 that a ‘nonfrivolous legal claim had been frustrated’ is fatal”). 13 Plaintiff fails to set forth sufficient allegations to support a claim regarding access to courts. 14 Should the plaintiff wish to pursue such a claim, she shall consider the above legal standards. 15 F. Bias 16 Plaintiff asserts that she filed a lawsuit against the Kern County District Attorney’s Office 17 around March 10, 2014 seeking $48,000,000, and claims several former members of that office are 18 now judicial officers on the Kern Count…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard Jordan v. Georgia Department of Corrections
See Owens, 295 Ga. at 317 (citing a case in which a compounding pharmacy “was demanding the return of the execution drugs that it had supplied to the State of Texas because it was being harassed” (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Gissendaner v. Comm’r, Ga. Dep’t of Corr., 803 F.3d 565, 569 (11th Cir. 2015) (“Gissendaner II”) (“To require . . . that Georgia open up about its source of pentobarbital would result in the drug becoming completely unavailable for use in executions, even though its use does not violate the Eighth Amendment.”), cert. denied sub nom., Gissen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard Jordan v. Georgia Department of Corrections
See Owens , 295 Ga. at 317 , 758 S.E.2d 794 (citing a case in which a compounding pharmacy "was demanding the return of the execution drugs that it had supplied to the State of Texas because it was being harassed" (internal quotation marks omitted) ); see also Gissendaner v. Comm'r , Ga. Dep't of Corr. , 803 F.3d 565 , 569 (11th Cir. 2015) (" Gissendaner II") ("To require ... that Georgia open up about its source of pentobarbital would result in the drug becoming completely unavailable for use in executions, even *1266 though its use does not violate the Eighth Amendment."), cert. denied sub n…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David Anthony TAYLOR
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 14–6166..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 2015.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2)
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted.