Kirschenbaum v. Dep't of Labor, 136 S. Ct. 317 (2015). · Go Syfert
Kirschenbaum v. Dep't of Labor, 136 S. Ct. 317 (2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“laims of ineffective assistance of counsel merit a new trial only where the error may have affected the verdict”
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Stevens (massappct, 2018-08-15)
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Stevens
Mass. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
laims of ineffective assistance of counsel merit a new trial only where the error may have affected the verdict
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Robinson
Mass. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. LaChance , 469 Mass. 854 , 858, 17 N.E.3d 1101 (2014), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 317 , 193 L.Ed.2d 227 (2015) (we interpret substantial risk of miscarriage of justice standard as being essentially same as prejudice requirement for claim of ineffective assistance of counsel).
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Holland
Mass. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Penn, 472 Mass. 610, 622 (2015), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 1656 (2016), quoting Commonwealth v. LaChance, 469 Mass. 854, 857 (2014), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 317 (2015). c.
cited Cited "see" The First Marblehead Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue
Mass. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See The First Marblehead Corp. v. Massachusetts Comm’r of Revenue, 136 S. Ct. 317 (2015).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Doe, SORB No. 209081 v. Sex Offender Registry Board
Mass. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. LaChance, 469 Mass. 854, 859 (2014), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 317 (2015) (distinguishing between "circumstances where the essential right to the assistance of counsel itself has been denied," and prejudice is presumed, and "circumstances where ineffectiveness is based on '[a]n error by counsel,'" where prejudice must be shown [citation omitted]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth KIRSCHENBAUM, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of the Robert Plan Corporation
v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
No. 14-1331.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 2015.
136 S. Ct. 317

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.