green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.0 score
“laims of ineffective assistance of counsel merit a new trial only where the error may have affected the verdict”
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Stevens
laims of ineffective assistance of counsel merit a new trial only where the error may have affected the verdict
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Robinson
See Commonwealth v. LaChance , 469 Mass. 854 , 858, 17 N.E.3d 1101 (2014), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 317 , 193 L.Ed.2d 227 (2015) (we interpret substantial risk of miscarriage of justice standard as being essentially same as prejudice requirement for claim of ineffective assistance of counsel).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Holland
See Commonwealth v. Penn, 472 Mass. 610, 622 (2015), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 1656 (2016), quoting Commonwealth v. LaChance, 469 Mass. 854, 857 (2014), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 317 (2015). c.
cited
Cited "see"
The First Marblehead Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue
See The First Marblehead Corp. v. Massachusetts Comm’r of Revenue, 136 S. Ct. 317 (2015).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe, SORB No. 209081 v. Sex Offender Registry Board
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. LaChance, 469 Mass. 854, 859 (2014), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 317 (2015) (distinguishing between "circumstances where the essential right to the assistance of counsel itself has been denied," and prejudice is presumed, and "circumstances where ineffectiveness is based on '[a]n error by counsel,'" where prejudice must be shown [citation omitted]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth KIRSCHENBAUM, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of the Robert Plan Corporation
v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
No. 14-1331.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 2015.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Appeals Court (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.