Feas v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 690 (2018). · Go Syfert
Search
Feas v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 690 (2018). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“we may find congress has expressed unambiguous intent by examining the statute's text, structure, and legislative history, and apply the relevant canons of interpretation.”
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co., Ltd. v. United States (cit, 2018-04-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co., Ltd. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
we may find congress has expressed unambiguous intent by examining the statute's text, structure, and legislative history, and apply the relevant canons of interpretation.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alina FEAS
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 17–726..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 2018.
138 S. Ct. 690
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: #29,606 of 633,719
Citer courts: Court of International Trade (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.