Richard v. City of Mobile, 208 U.S. 480 (1908). · Go Syfert
Search
Richard v. City of Mobile, 208 U.S. 480 (1908). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Maurice Sigler v. Vincent R. Lowrie (ca8, 1969-01-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1925 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1925 1975 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Maurice Sigler v. Vincent R. Lowrie
8th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ughbanks v. Armstrong, 208 U.S. 481, 488 , 28 S.Ct. 372 , 52 L.Ed. 582 (1908).
cited Cited "see" Tunstill v. State
Ala. Ct. App. · 1962 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ughbanks v. Armstrong, 208 U.S. 481 , 28 S.Ct. 372 , 52 L.Ed. 582 .
discussed Cited "see" In Re Larsen
Cal. · 1955 · signal: see · confidence high
It has been held that the due process of law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment is not infringed by the decision of a state court asserting the validity of an indeterminate sentence law (Dreyer v. Illinois, 187 U.S. 71 [ 23 S.Ct. 28 , 47 L.Ed. 79 ]; see Ughbanks v. Armstrong, 208 U.S. 481 [ 28 S.Ct. 372 , 52 L.Ed. 582 ]; In re Smith, supra, 33 Cal.2d at 804 .) For the reasons above stated the order to show cause heretofore issued is discharged and the application for the writ of habeas corpus is denied.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Poe v. Werner (2×)
M.D. Penn. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Ughbanks v. Armstrong, 1908, 208 U.S. 481 , 28 S.Ct. 372 , 52 L.Ed. 582 ; Sas v. Maryland, D.Md, 1969, 295 F.Supp. 389, 418, 419 , aff’d sub nom.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Junius S. Washington v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1968 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Ugh banks v. Armstrong, 208 U.S. 481, 487 , 28 S.Ct. 372 , 52 L.Ed. 582 (1908); Leeper v. Texas, 139 U.S. 462, 467-468 , 11 S.Ct. 577 , 35 L.Ed. 225 (1891); Caldwell v. Texas, 137 U.S. 692, 697-698 , 11 S.Ct. 224 , 34 L.Ed. 816 (1891). 43 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard
v.
City of Mobile
112.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1908.
208 U.S. 480
Mr. Richard William Stoutz, with whom Mr. Walter A. White was on the brief, for plaintiff in error., Mr. Burnell Boykin Boone for defendant in error.1
Peckham.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Mr. Justice Peckham

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a judgment of . the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Alabama, sustaining-the demurrer of the City of Mobile to a bill filed by the appellants, and dismissing the same. It appears that the appellants sought to obtain- an injunction to restrain the city from collecting the amount of the license tax 'imposed under the ordinance of the city upon those who were engaged in sell-’ ing beer in the city by the barrel, half barrel or quarter barrel.

[*481] The question involved is, as counsel for appellants admits, identical with' that which has just been decided in the foregoing case; No. 113, and for the reasons therein stated the judgment of the Circuit Court is .

Affirmed.