green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Leading Edge Products, Inc.
See In re Inter-City Trust, 295 F. 495, 497 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 265 U.S. 589 , 44 S.Ct. 635 , 68 L.Ed. 1194 (1924).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chittenden Trust Co. v. Mayo (In Re Mayo)
See, In re Dauchy, In re Locust Building Co., 299 F. 756, 765 (2d Cir.1924), cert. denied, 265 U.S. 590 , 44 S.Ct. 635 , 68 L.Ed. 1195 (1924) (The general rule is that fraud must be made out by a preponderance of evidence which should be so clear and strong as to preponderate over the general and reasonable assumption that men are honest and do not ordinarily commit fraud or act in bad faith) and more recently, Bank of Pennsylvania v. Aldman, supra. We are not aided in our search when we read cases involving fraud which use terms as “the proof (must be) clear and strong enough to preponderat…
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Dca Development Corporation, Debtors. Petition of Franchi Construction Co., Inc.
See In re Inter-City Trust, 295 F. 495, 497 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 265 U.S. 589 , 44 S.Ct. 635 , 68 L.Ed. 1194 (1924). 11 *47 Moreover, even where formal notice to affected parties is omitted or is insufficient, informal or constructive-notice which provides them with the same opportunity for a fair hearing can satisfy the procedural requirements of the Bankruptcy Act.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Clemens v. Cobley (In Re Cobley)
See e.g., In re Locust Building Co., 299 F. 756, 765 (2d Cir.) cert. denied 265 U.S. 590 , 44 S.Ct. 635 , 68 L.Ed. 1195 (1924).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commerce Trust Company
v.
F. Alexander Chandler, Co-Receivers
v.
F. Alexander Chandler, Co-Receivers
No. 994.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1924.
Mr. Robert G. Dodge and Mr. Harold S. Davis for petitioner. Mr. Judd Dewey for respondents.
Published
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.