Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co. v. Morrissett, 284 U.S. 584 (1931). · Go Syfert
Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co. v. Morrissett, 284 U.S. 584 (1931). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
55 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Walling v. Goldblatt Bros. (ca7, 1942-06-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1932 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1932 1979 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Walling v. Goldblatt Bros. (2×)
7th Cir. · 1942 · signal: see · confidence high
See Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Morrissett, D.C., 58 F.2d 991 , affirmed 284 U.S. 584 , 52 S.Ct. 127 , 76 L.Ed. 506 .
discussed Cited "see" Walling v. Goldblatt Bros. (2×)
7th Cir. · 1942 · signal: see · confidence high
See Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Morrissett, D.C., 58 F.2d 991 , *784 affirmed 284 U.S. 584 , 52 S.Ct. 127 , 76 L.Ed. 506 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Hollowbreast
D. Mont. · 1972 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Taylor v. Tayrien, 51 F.2d 884, 887 (10 Cir. 1931) cert. denied 284 U.S. 672 , 52 S.Ct. 127 , 76 L.Ed. 569 , where the court held that the Osage Act of 1906 “made no allotment of the mineral estate in the land; it remained tribal property.” The court said further at 890: “The idea in reserving the minerals to the tribe was doubtless a double one; it tended to equalize the allotments to the individuals, and it preserved intact a source to -which the Indian who had squandered his allotment, might look for sustenance. al 1906 it was thought that the Osages would be ready for comple…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Safeway Stores, Inc. v. City of Portland
Or. · 1935 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Morrissett, 58 Fed. (2d) 991 (Affirmed in 284 U. S. 584 ( 76 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
v.
Morrissett, State Tax Commissioner
No. 184.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 30, 1931.
284 U.S. 584
Mr. Thomas B. Gay for appellant., Mr. W. W. Martin, with whom Mr. Henry R. Miller, Jr., was on the brief, for appellees.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

Decree affirmed. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Jackson, 283 U. S. 527; Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Maxwell, ante, p. 575.