green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2004 ·
…he district in which the national bank has its principal place of business and which contains the place recited in its charter ... should be taken as the proper district for suits against a national bank.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1939 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1939
1982
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wachovia Bank, National Association v. Daniel G. Schmidt III Priag LLC Dgs Investments, Inc.
(2×)
he district in which the national bank has its principal place of business and which contains the place recited in its charter ... should be taken as the proper district for suits against a national bank.
cited
Cited "see"
TPO Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See Leonardi v. Chase National Bank, 81 F. 19 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 298 U.S. 677 , 56 S.Ct. 941 , 80 L.Ed. 1398 (1936).
cited
Cited "see"
Bevard v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company
See Bruckner-Mitchell v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York, 65 App.D.C. 178, 189 , 82 F.2d 484 , 445, certiorari denied 298 U.S. 677 , 56 S.Ct. 941 , 80 L.Ed. 1398 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Duke Power Co.
v.
Greenwood County
v.
Greenwood County
No. 934.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 18, 1936.
Messrs. W. S. O’B. Robinson, Newton D. Baker, Raymond T. Jackson, W. R. Perkins, H. J. Haynsworth, and J. H. Marion for petitioners. Mr. D. W. Robinson, Jr., and Solicitor General Reed for respondents.
Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (2)
Petition, for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for. the Fourth Circuit granted.