cited Cited "see, e.g." Getty Petroleum Corp. v. Bartco Petroleum Corp. See Koelemay, supra, at 523; see also Davilla v. Brunswick-Balke Collender Co., 94 F.2d 567, 570 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 304 U.S. 572 , 58 S.Ct. 1040 , 82 L.Ed. 1536 (1938).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Getty Petroleum Corp. v. Bartco Petroleum Corp. See Koelemay, supra, at 523; see also Davilla v. Brunswick-Balke Collender Co., 94 F.2d 567, 570 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 304 U.S. 572 , 58 S.Ct. 1040 , 82 L.Ed. 1536 (1938). 38 During the 1925 joint hearings on the draft of an early trademark bill, Rogers contrasted the 1905 Act's treble damages provision with a proposed provision that would give courts discretion to raise or lower awards of damages and profits 39 [The 1905 Act's trebling provision] seems to me to be useless, and anything more than proper compensation, an artificial increase, is in the nature of a penalty.