Woodring v. Clarksburg-Columbus Short Route Bridge Co., 302 U.S. 658 (1937). · Go Syfert
Search
Woodring v. Clarksburg-Columbus Short Route Bridge Co., 302 U.S. 658 (1937). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wallace F. Thrall v. Cecil M. Wolfe, Regional Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service (ca7, 1974-08-23) · Strongest negative: State v. Edmondson (nmctapp, 1991-09-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" State v. Edmondson (2×)
N.M. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see People v. Terry, 61 Cal.2d 137 , 390 P.2d 381 , 37 Cal.Rptr. 605 (en banc) (Oklahoma pardon given same effect in California that it would have in Oklahoma), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 866 , 85 S.Ct. 132 , 13 L.Ed.2d 68 (1964), rejecting sub silentio, People v. Dutton, 9 Cal.2d 505 , 71 P.2d 218 , appeal dismissed, 302 U.S. 656 , 58 S.Ct. 365 , 82 L.Ed. 508 (1937).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wallace F. Thrall v. Cecil M. Wolfe, Regional Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service
7th Cir. · 1974 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare People v. Dutton, 9 Cal.2d 505 , 71 P.2d 218 , appeal dismissed 302 U.S. 656 , 58 S.Ct. 365 , 82 L.Ed. 508 (1937); Groseclose v. Plummer, 106 F.2d 311, 313 (9th Cir. 1939), cert. denied, 308 U.S. 614 , 60 S.Ct. 264 , 84 L.Ed. 513 , with People v. Terry, 61 Cal.2d 137 , 37 Cal.Rptr. 605 , 390 P.2d 381, 388-389 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 866 , 85 S.Ct. 132 , 13 L.Ed.2d 68 (1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Woodring, Secretary of War
v.
Clarksburg-Columbus Short Route Bridge Co.
No. 39.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 20, 1937.
302 U.S. 658
Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Whitaker, and Messrs. J. Frank Staley and Paul A. Sweeney for petitioners. Mr. George D. Horning, Jr., for respondent.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Certiorari, 301 U. S. 679, to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Per Curiam:

The motion of the petitioners to reverse the judgment and remand the cause to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, with instructions to dismiss the bill, is granted, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the bill of complaint upon the ground that the cause is moot. Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216, 217, 218; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U. S. 528, 535, 536; Bracken v. Securities & Exchange Comm’n, 299 U. S. 504.