green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1984 ·
…there must, of course, be first established a prima facie case; the mere assertion of an intended crime or fraud is not enough to release the attorney.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1931 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1931
1978
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Maguigan
(2×)
there must, of course, be first established a prima facie case; the mere assertion of an intended crime or fraud is not enough to release the attorney.
discussed
Cited "see"
Confectionery and Tobacco Drivers and Warehousemen's Union, Local 805, Ibtcwha v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. M. Eskin & Son
Therefore we have taken jurisdiction over the entire controversy (29 U.S.C. 160(e) and 160(f); International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. N.L.R.B., 96 U.S.App.D.C. 272 , 225 F.2d 923 (1955); see Hicks v. N.L.R.B., 100 F.2d 804 (4 Cir. 1939), cert. denied, 308 U.S. 554 , 60 S.Ct. 115 , 84 L.Ed. 466 ), and have ordered that the separate proceedings be consolidated for purposes of briefing and oral argument. 3 At issue in these cases are acts of the Union and the employer in response to a 'wildcat strike' of 21 dissident Union members in 1959.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
First Union Nat. Bank v. Whitener
See, e.g., United States v. Bob, 106 F.2d 37 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 308 U.S. 589 , 60 S.Ct. 115 , 84 L.Ed. 493 (1939); Standard Fire Ins.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Coleman v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Bob, 106 F.2d 37 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 308 U.S. 589 , 60 S.Ct. 115 , 84 L.Ed. 493 (1939) and In Re Sealed Case, 754 F.2d 395 (D.C.Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.
See also, United States v. Bob, 106 F.2d 37 (2d Cir. 1939), cert. denied, 308 U.S. 589 , 60 S.Ct. 115 , 84 L.Ed. 493 (1939).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hicks
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 336.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1939.
Mr. Alexander H. Sands for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (2)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis, denied.