green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1943 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1943
1984
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bykofsky v. Borough of Middletown
In Williams v. Miller, 1942, 317 U.S. 599 , 63 S.Ct. 258 , 87 L.Ed. 489 , aff’g per curiam N.D.Cal.1943, 48 F. Supp. 277 , where the penalties imposed for a violation of the contested statute ranged up to six months in jail and a fine of five hundred dollars, the Court held that “the bill does not allege facts which would warrant the granting of equitable relief.” 317 U.S. at 599 , 63 S.Ct. at 258.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cortec Industries, Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P.
See Samara v. United States, 129 F.2d 594, 597 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 686 , 63 S.Ct. 258 , 87 L.Ed. 549 (1942); Boro Hall Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 124 F.2d 822, 823 (2d Cir.1942), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 695 , 63 S.Ct. 436 , 87 L.Ed. 556 (1943); Fed.R.Civ.P. 12, 1946 Amendment, Notes of Advisory Committee.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cortec Industries, Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P.
See Samara v. United States, 129 F.2d 594, 597 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 686 , 63 S.Ct. 258 , 87 L.Ed. 549 (1942); Boro Hall Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 124 F.2d 822, 823 (2d Cir.1942), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 695 , 63 S.Ct. 436 , 87 L.Ed. 556 (1943); Fed.R.Civ.P. 12, 1946 Amendment, Notes of Advisory Committee.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shane v. Marceca (In Re Marceca)
See, Samara v. United States, 129 F.2d 594 (2d Cir.1942), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 686 , 63 S.Ct. 258 , 87 L.Ed. 549 ; Boro Hall Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 124 F.2d 822 (2d Cir.1942), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 695 , 63 S.Ct. 436 , 87 L.Ed. 556 (1942).
cited
Cited "see"
Khaimi v. Schonberger
See Samara v. United States, 129 F.2d 594, 597 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 686 , 63 S.Ct. 258 , 87 L.Ed. 549 (1942); Note of the Advisory Committee on Rule 12(b)(6); Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c).
cited
Cited "see"
William Dinneen v. Robert E. Williams
See Williams v. Miller, D.C., 48 F.Supp. 277 , modified 317 TJ.S. 599, 63 S.Ct. 258 , 87 L.Ed. 489 ; Geach v. Moynahan, 7 Cir., 207 F.2d 714 . 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Union Pacific Corporation v. United States
See, e.g., Utah Copper Co. v. Railroad Retirement Bd., 129 F.2d 358, 363 (10th Cir.) cert. denied, 317 U.S. 687 , 63 S.Ct. 258 , 87 L.Ed. 550 (1942) (carrier and sibling corporation owned by parent company are “under common control”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Utah Copper Co.
v.
Railroad Retirement Board
v.
Railroad Retirement Board
No. 479.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 7, 1942.
Messrs. C. C. Parsons, H. Thomas Austern, and Elmer L. Brock for petitioners. Solicitor General Fahy for respondents.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.