green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.3 score
“the debt, which is effective when actually made, will be made antecedent to the delayed effective date of the transfer”
Treatment trajectory · 1943 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1943
1984
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
King-Porter Company v. Scanlon
Such legal fictions include, for example, (1) the 'entity' theory, see, e.g., DuBay v. Williams, supra, 417 F.2d at 1287 n. 8; Manchester National Bank v. Roche, 1 Cir. 1951, 186 F.2d 827, 831 ; In re White, S.D.Ohio 1967, 283 F.Supp. 208, 210 ; In re Portland Newspaper Publishing Co., supra, 271 F.Supp. at 399-400 ; Rosenberg v. Rudnick, supra, 262 F.Supp. at 639 ; (2) the 'substitution' theory, see, e.g., In re Pusey, Maynes, Breish Co., 3 Cir. 1941, 122 F.2d 606 ; (3) the 'relation back' theory, see, e.g., DuBay v. Williams, supra, 417 F.2d at 1287-1288 ; but see Corn Exchange Bank v. Klaud…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Mills Morris Co. of Mississippi, Inc. v. Scanlon
Such legal fictions include, for example, (1) the “entity” theory, see, e. g., DuBay v. Williams, supra, 417 F.2d at 1287 n. 8; Manchester National Bank v. Roche, 1 Cir. 1951, 186 F.2d 827, 831 ; In re White, S.D.Ohio 1967, 283 F.Supp. 208, 210 ; In re Portland Newspaper Publishing Co., supra, 271 F.Supp. at 399-400 ; Rosenberg v. Rudnick, supra, 262 F.Supp. at 639 ; (2) the “substitution” theory, see, e. g., In re Pusey, Maynes, Breish Co., 3 Cir. 1941, 122 F.2d 606 ; (3) the “relation back” theory, see, e. g., DuBay v. Williams, supra, 417 F.2d at 1287-1288 ; but see Corn Exchang…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Schatz v. Imperial Capital Bank (In Re Schatz)
the debt, which is effective when actually made, will be made antecedent to the delayed effective date of the transfer
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Bergquist v. Anderson-Greenwood Aviation Corp. (In Re Bellanca Aircraft Corp.)
(3×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Klauder, 318 U.S. at 436-37 , 63 S.Ct. at 681 (footnote omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrew Johnson v. Catherine Bauman
See Ex parte Davis, 318 U.S. 412, 412 (1943) (per curiam) (refusing to excuse exhaustion when the Supreme Court of Indiana denied an indigent pro se prisoner’s request for a transcript); McCrea v. Jackson, 148 F.2d 193 , 197–98 (6th Cir. 1945) (concluding a prisoner had failed to exhaust when he could apply for leave to file an untimely motion for a new trial in state court).
cited
Cited "see"
Dorey v. Thorsell (In Re Thorsell)
Accord, Com Exchange National Bank and Trust Company v. Klauder, 318 U.S. 434 , 63 S.Ct. 679 , 87 L.Ed. 884 (1943).
cited
Cited "see"
Stern v. Continental Assurance Co. (In Re Ryan)
See Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co. v. Klauder, 318 U.S. 434 , 63 S.Ct. 679 , 87 L.Ed. 884 (1943).
cited
Cited "see"
Young v. Republic National Factors Corp. (In Re Lucasa International, Ltd.)
See Corn Exchange Bank v. Klauder, 318 U.S. 434 , 63 S.Ct. 679 , 87 L.Ed. 884 (1943).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coleman v. Kirshenbaum Investment Co. (In re Cascella)
See, Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co. v. Klander, 318 U.S. 434 , 63 S.Ct. 679 , 87 L.Ed. 884 (1943); see also, In re Vardaman Shoe Company, 52 F.Supp. 562 (D.C.Mo. 1943); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, supra, at 941.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grain Merchants of Indiana, Inc.
See Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co., Philadelphia v. Klauder, 318 U.S. 434 , 63 S.Ct. 679 , 87 L.Ed. 884 (1943); In re Vardaman Shoe Co., 52 F.Supp. 562 (E.D.Mo.1943).
cited
Cited "see"
France v. Union Bank & Savings Co.
See Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co., Philadelphia v. Klauder, 318 U.S. 434 , 63 S.Ct. 679 , 87 L.Ed. 884 (1943); In re Vardaman Shoe Co., 52 F.Supp. 562 (E.D.Mo.1943).
cited
Cited "see"
Mayo v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Co.
See Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co., Philadelphia v. Klauder, 1943, 318 U.S. 434 , 63 S.Ct. 679 , 87 L.Ed. 884 .
cited
Cited "see"
Mayo v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Company
See Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co., Philadelphia v. Klauder, 1943, 318 U.S. 434 , 63 S.Ct. 679 , 87 L.Ed. 884 .
discussed
Cited "see"
National Discount Corporation v. William B. Tyson, Jr., as Trustee for Appliances, Inc., Bankrupt
See, however, Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co., Philadelphia v. Klauder, 318 U.S. 434 , 63 S.Ct. 679 , 87 L.Ed. 884 , and the specific reference to the Bailey case in House Report No. 1293, 81st Congress, Second Session, 2 Congressional Service, 1950, page 1986.
cited
Cited "see"
In re Beedle-Whiton Co.
See Com Exchange National Bank v. Klauder, 1943, 318 U.S. 434 , 63 S.Ct. 679 , 87 L.Ed. 884 .
cited
Cited "see"
Wells v. Place
See Corn Exchange Bank Co. v. Klauder, 318 U. S. 434 , 63 S. Ct, 679 , 87 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Standard Oil Co. v. Defense Plant Corp.
See Corn Exchange Bank v. Klauder, 318 U.S. 434 , 63 S.Ct. 679 , 87 L.Ed. 884 , 144 A.L.R. 1189 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
12 Collier bankr.cas.2d 40, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,247 Re: In the Matter Of: Ramco American International, Inc., a Corporation of the State of Delaware, Debtor-In-Possession Appeal of Pan-American World Airways, Inc., Judgment Creditor
See, e.g., Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co. v. Kaulder, 318 U.S. 434 , 63 S.Ct. 679 , 87 L.Ed. 884 (1943). 6 The parties agree that New Jersey law controls this issue.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Ramco American International, Inc.
See, e.g., Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co. v. Kaulder, 318 U.S. 434 , 63 S.Ct. 679 , 87 L.Ed. 884 (1943).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ex Parte Elmer Davis
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 1943.
Elmer Davis, pro se.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 41 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. New Hampshire (1)
Per Curiam.
After we denied, without prejudice, petitioner’s previous application for leave to file in this Court a petition for habeas corpus, 317 U. S. 592, the Circuit Court of Vigo County, Indiana, on December 29, 1942, sustained a demurrer to his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Petitioner now alleges that he has filed an appeal from that court to the Supreme Court of Indiana. He also alleges that his request that a transcript of the coram nobis proceeding be furnished free of charge, because he is a poor person, has been denied. He contends that in the absence of a transcript of the coram nobis proceeding, he is left without a remedy by appeal in the courts of Indiana. But we cannot assume that the Supreme Court of Indiana will refuse to use its process to bring before it such parts of the record as may be necessary for a decision of the case, or that, in that event, it will refuse to enter an order finally disposing of the appeal. Until the Supreme Court of Indiana has acted upon an application for an order finally disposing of the appeal — which, if adverse to petitioner, he could make the subject of a petition for certiorari to this Court — the remedies afforded by state appellate procedure have not been fully exhausted. Accordingly, we deny petitioner’s present application without prejudice.
Leave denied.