Wood v. Tawes, 318 U.S. 788 (1943). · Go Syfert
Wood v. Tawes, 318 U.S. 788 (1943). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Robinson v. Howard University (dc, 1983-01-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1945 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1945 1985 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Robinson v. Howard University (2×)
D.C. · 1983 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
trial courts have large discretion in regard to costs, and it is not the function of appellate courts to substitute their own discretion
cited Cited "see" United States v. Kraskouskas
cma · 1958 · signal: see · confidence high
See Romero v Squier, 133 F2d 528 (CA 9th Cir) (1943), cert den 318 US 785 , 63 S Ct 982 , 87 L ed 1152 (1943).
cited Cited "see" Reiling v. Lacy
D. Maryland · 1950 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wood v. Tawes, 181 Md. 155 , 28 A.2d 850 , certiorari denied 318 U.S. 788 , 63 S.Ct. 982 , 87 L.Ed. 1154 ; Matthews v. Rodgers, 287 U.S. 521 , 52 S.Ct. 217 , 76 L.Ed. 447 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Baez v. United States Department of Justice
D.C. Cir. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Shima v. Brown, 140 F.2d 337 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 318 U.S. 787 , 63 S.Ct. 982 , 87 L.Ed. 1154 (1943); Compania Pelineon De Navegacion, S. A. v. Texas Petroleum Co., 540 F.2d 53, 56 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1041 , 97 S.Ct. 741 , 50 L.Ed.2d 753 (1977); Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh, 538 F.2d 991, 999 (3d Cir. 1976); Constantino v. American S/T Achilles, 580 F.2d 121 (4th Cir. 1978); Walters v. Roadway Express, Inc., 557 F.2d 521 (5th Cir. 1977); Lichter Foundation, Inc. v. Welch, 269 F.2d 142 (6th Cir. 1959); Popeil Bros. v. Schick Elec., Inc., 516 F.2d 772 (7t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wood
v.
Tawes, Comptroller
No. 805.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 12, 1943.
318 U.S. 788
Messrs. A. F. Prescott, Jr., Jo. V. Morgan, and Clarence E. Dawson for petitioners. Mr. William C. Walsh, Attorney General of Maryland, for respondents.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: District of Columbia Court of … (2)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.