green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1983 ·
…trial courts have large discretion in regard to costs, and it is not the function of appellate courts to substitute their own discretion
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1945 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1945
1985
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robinson v. Howard University
(2×)
trial courts have large discretion in regard to costs, and it is not the function of appellate courts to substitute their own discretion
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kraskouskas
See Romero v Squier, 133 F2d 528 (CA 9th Cir) (1943), cert den 318 US 785 , 63 S Ct 982 , 87 L ed 1152 (1943).
cited
Cited "see"
Reiling v. Lacy
See Wood v. Tawes, 181 Md. 155 , 28 A.2d 850 , certiorari denied 318 U.S. 788 , 63 S.Ct. 982 , 87 L.Ed. 1154 ; Matthews v. Rodgers, 287 U.S. 521 , 52 S.Ct. 217 , 76 L.Ed. 447 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baez v. United States Department of Justice
See, e.g., Shima v. Brown, 140 F.2d 337 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 318 U.S. 787 , 63 S.Ct. 982 , 87 L.Ed. 1154 (1943); Compania Pelineon De Navegacion, S. A. v. Texas Petroleum Co., 540 F.2d 53, 56 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1041 , 97 S.Ct. 741 , 50 L.Ed.2d 753 (1977); Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh, 538 F.2d 991, 999 (3d Cir. 1976); Constantino v. American S/T Achilles, 580 F.2d 121 (4th Cir. 1978); Walters v. Roadway Express, Inc., 557 F.2d 521 (5th Cir. 1977); Lichter Foundation, Inc. v. Welch, 269 F.2d 142 (6th Cir. 1959); Popeil Bros. v. Schick Elec., Inc., 516 F.2d 772 (7t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wood
v.
Tawes, Comptroller
v.
Tawes, Comptroller
No. 805.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 12, 1943.
Messrs. A. F. Prescott, Jr., Jo. V. Morgan, and Clarence E. Dawson for petitioners. Mr. William C. Walsh, Attorney General of Maryland, for respondents.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia Court of … (2)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.