green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Washington Public Interest Organization v. Public Service Commission
(2×)
See Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Public Utilities Comm'n., 81 U.S.App.D.C. 225, 226-28 , 158 F.2d 521, 522-24 (1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 816 , 67 S.Ct. 1303 , 91 L.Ed. 1834 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bernard Austin v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., in addition to Bostic, Bullock and Frady, discussed supra, Thomas v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 314 , 158 F.2d 97 (1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 822 , 67 S.Ct. 1303 , 91 L.Ed. 1838 (1947) 15 The Government argues that the instruction as given 'implicitly includes the concept of an appreciable time lapse.' No reason is advanced why the judge might properly have refused the requested instruction.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Durrett
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 999.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 5, 1947.
Published
No opinion found. Click here to view source material.