cited Cited "see" Berg v. Richmond Unified School District See Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678, 682-683 , 67 S.Ct. 773 , 90 L.Ed. 939 (1946); Holder v. Nelson, 514 F.2d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 1975).

discussed Cited "see" 11 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1285, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,553 Sonja Lynn Berg, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Female Employees of the Richmond Unified School District v. Richmond Unified School District See Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678 , 682--683, 67 S.Ct. 773 , 90 L.Ed. 939 (1946); Holder v. Nelson, 514 F.2d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 1975). 7 Applying the test of Goosby v. Osser, 409 U.S. 512, 518 , 93 S.Ct. 854 , 35 L.Ed.2d 36 (1973), as further elucidated in Hagans, supra, 415 U.S. at 536 --543, 94 S.Ct. 1372 , we conclude that plaintiff's § 1983 due process and equal protection claims were not 'so utterly devoid of merit as to deprive the district court of its jurisdiction under § 1343.' Holder v. Nelson,supra, 514 F.2d at 1092 . 5 8 Moreover, it appears to us that the district court had subje…