green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1950 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1950
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.
(2×)
See Bowles v. Wilke, 175 F.2d 35, 37-38 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 861 , 70 S.Ct. 104 , 94 L.Ed. 528 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.
(2×)
See Bowles v. Wilke, 175 F.2d 35, 37-38 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 861 , 70 S.Ct. 104 , 94 L.Ed. 528 (1949).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Abraham T. Oliva
Accord, Briggs v. United States, 10 Cir. 1949, 176 F.2d 317, 320 , cert. denied 338 U.S. 861 , 70 S.Ct. 103 , 94 L.Ed. 528 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Shawmut, Inc. v. American Viscose Corp.
(2×)
See Bowles v. Wilke, 7 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 35, 37 , certiorari denied, 1949, 338 U.S. 861 , 70 S.Ct. 104 , 94 L.Ed. 528 , where the court said: “The only restraint upon a second judge in passing upon an interlocutory issue decided by another judge in the same case is one of comity only, which in no way infringes upon the power of the second judge to act.” The motions to modify having originally been made within the period required by Rule 45(b) and renewed in reliance upon an order of the court, it would be unjust to hold otherwise than that the timeliness of the motions should be determi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Poindexter v. Folsom
(2×)
Compare, Bowles v. Wilke, 7 Cir., 175 F.2d 35 , certiorari denied 1949, 338 U.S. 861 , 70 S.Ct. 104 , 94 L.Ed. 528 6 Seven Oaks, Inc., v. Federal Housing Administration, 4 Cir., 1948, 171 F.2d 947, 950 ; Sigona v. Slusser, D.C.D.Conn. 1954, 124 F.Supp. 327 , 328 7 E.g., Ignelzi v. Granger, D.C.W.D.Pa. 1955, 16 F.R.D. 517 8 The Snyder v. Buck case involved abatement under Sec. 11(a) of the 1925 Judiciary Act, but the principle is the same.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Poindexter v. Folsom
Compare, Bowles v. Wilke, 7 Cir., 175 F.2d 35 , certiorari denied 1949, 338 U.S. 861 , 70 S.Ct.104, 94 L.Ed. 528 . .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bowles, for and in behalf of the United States
v.
Wilke
v.
Wilke
No. 299.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 24, 1949.
Solicitor General Perlman for petitioners. Cushman B. Bissell for respondents.
Application, Consideration, Douglas, Took.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Minton took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.