Oro Fino Consol. Mines, Inc. v. United States, 341 U.S. 948 (1951). · Go Syfert
Search
Oro Fino Consol. Mines, Inc. v. United States, 341 U.S. 948 (1951). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Etchegoinberry v. United States (uscfc, 2013-09-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Etchegoinberry v. United States (2×)
Fed. Cl. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Plaintiffs were entitled to defer action until they knew how much of their property would be taken pursuant to the set-aside order and then bring one suit for all of it.” Id. at 440 ; see also Oro Fina Consolidated Mines, Inc. v. United States, 92 F.Supp. 1016, 1017 , 118 Ct.Cl. 18 (1950) (holding that a 1950 suit seeking just compensation for losses incurred from 1943 to 1945 due to a 1942 government order banning gold mining during the war was not time-barred because the order was not revoked until 1945 and, until that point, plaintiffs could not know exactly what was taken, and which the …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oro Fino Consolidated Mines, Inc.
v.
United States
No. 667.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 4, 1951.
341 U.S. 948
Prew Savoy for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge, Samuel D. Slade and Melvin Richter for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.