Wenning v. Peoples Bank Co., 340 U.S. 858 (1950). · Go Syfert
Search
Wenning v. Peoples Bank Co., 340 U.S. 858 (1950). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Howell (kan, 1977-12-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951 1988 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Howell
Kan. · 1977 · confidence medium
(State v. Caldrone, 202 Kan. 651, 653 , 451 P.2d 205 [1969]; State v. Brown, 181 Kan. 375 , 312 P.2d 832 [1957]; State v. Aspinwall, 173 Kan. 699 , 252 P.2d 841 [1953]; State v. Neff, 169 Kan. 116 , 218 P.2d 248 [1950], cert. den., 340 U.S. 866 , 95 L.Ed 632, 71 S.Ct. 90 .) While there are certain recognized dangers which may prejudice a defendant when joinder is allowed, a careful examination of the record in this case leads to the conclusion that the prejudice, if any, resulting from non-severance was minimal.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Basker
Kan. · 1967 · confidence medium
In State v. Neff, 169 Kan. 116 , 218 P.2d 248 , cert. den. 340 U.S. 866 , 95 L.ed. 632, 71 S.Ct. 90 , this court held that in determining whether the giving of such an instruction constituted reversible error, the instruction, the circumstances existing at the time it was given, and its probable effect in the light of the entire record are to be considered.
discussed Cited "see" Coppersmith v. Coppersmith
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pawley v. Pawley, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 464 , 28 A.L.R.2d 1358 , rehearing denied Fla., 47 So.2d 546 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 866 , 71 S.Ct. 90 , 95 L.Ed. 632 ; Annotation 28 A.L.R.2d 1378 , 1390.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wenning
v.
Peoples Bank Co.
No. 293.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 23, 1950.
340 U.S. 858
Elmer McClain for appellant-petitioner. Kahl K. Spriggs for the Peoples Bank Co. et al.; and Carleton Carl Reiser and Alexander M. Heron for Davis et al., appellees-respondents.
Are, Black, Consideration, Down, Hearing, Merits, Postponed, Question, Reed, Should, That.
Published
Per Curiam:

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Reed, and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that this case should be set down for argument and that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.