Douglas Hotel Co. v. Comm'r, 342 U.S. 893 (1951). · Go Syfert
Search
Douglas Hotel Co. v. Comm'r, 342 U.S. 893 (1951). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“when the government is acting in its proprietary capacity, its representative has authority to waive or modify a provision in a government contract, and the government may be estopped by such act of waiver in the same manner as a private contractor.”
58 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Miller Elevator Co. v. United States (uscfc, 1994-02-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Miller Elevator Co. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1994 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
when the government is acting in its proprietary capacity, its representative has authority to waive or modify a provision in a government contract, and the government may be estopped by such act of waiver in the same manner as a private contractor.
cited Cited "see" Starflight Boats v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Casey v. United States, 342 U.S. 892 , 72 S.Ct. 200 , 96 L.Ed. 668 (1951).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gilman
D. Maryland · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Branch Banking & Trust v. United States, 98 F.Supp. 757 , 120 Ct.Cl. 72 , cert. denied, 342 U.S. 893 , 72 S.Ct. 200 , 96 L.Ed. 669 (1951).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. McVeigh
W.D. Okla. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., McCoy v. Providente Journal Co., 190 F.2d 760, 765-66 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 894 , 72 S.Ct. 200 , 96 L.Ed. 669 (1951).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Ray v. United States
D.S.C. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. United States, 98 F.Supp. 757 , 120 Ct.Cl. 72 (1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 893 , 72 S.Ct. 200 , 96 L.Ed. 669 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Douglas Hotel Co.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 383.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1951.
342 U.S. 893
William. J. Hotz and William J. Hotz, Jr. for petitioner., Solicitor General Perlman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Slack, A. F. Prescott and Fred E. Youngmdn for respondent.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 57%
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.