green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Sunbeam Television Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
See Scripps-Howard Radio v. Federal Communications Commission, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 13 , 189 F.2d 677 , certiorari denied 342 U.S. 830 , 72 S.Ct. 55 , 96 L.Ed. 628 ; Clarksburg Publishing Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 98 U.S.App.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David John Erickson v. National Transportation Safety Board, and Donald D. Engen, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
See Western Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 495 F.2d 145,152 (D.C.Cir.1974) (reviewing court must accept agency’s conclusions if findings supporting them are in turn supported by substantial evidence); see also Scripps-Howard Radio v. Federal Communications Commission, 189 F.2d 677, 681 (D.C.Cir.) (in agency’s decision, ultimate facts as found must appear as rational inferences from findings of basic facts), (quoting Johnston Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 175 F.2d 351, 357 (D.C.Cir.1949)), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 830 , 72 S.Ct. 55 , 96 L.Ed. 628 (1951).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fidelity Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Rko General, Inc., Intervenor
(2×)
See also Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. FCC, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 13 , 189 F.2d 677 , cert. denied, 342 U.S. 830 , 72 S.Ct. 55 , 96 L.Ed. 628 (1951). 40 The court makes a rather extraordinary cite to McClatchy Broadcasting Co., 19 F.C.C. 343 , 380-81 (1954), aff'd McClatchy Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 195 , 239 F.2d 15 (1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 918 , 77 S.Ct. 662 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957) in which the Hearing Examiner relied on the so-called "autonomy" argument to reduce a diversification preference (although not to eliminate it).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc.
v.
Federal Communications Commission
v.
Federal Communications Commission
No. 228.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1951.
Raymond T. Jackson, George S. Smith and Harry P. Warner for petitioner., Solicitor General Perl-man, Assistant Attorney General Morison, Ralph S. Spritzer, Benedict P. Cottone and Max Goldman for respondent.
Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari[*831] denied.
Raymond T. Jackson, George S. Smith and Harry P. Warner for petitioner. Solicitor General Perl-man, Assistant Attorney General Morison, Ralph S. Spritzer, Benedict P. Cottone and Max Goldman for respondent.